A Paragard lawsuit is a state for financial compensation by women injured by the arm of the Paragard IUD T 380A breaking off and embedding in the uterine cavity.
Plaintiffs allege that Teva Pharmaceuticals and the Cooper Companies:
created a faulty contraceptive device and
didn't warn patients and doctors about the substantial risk of the device fracturing upon removal (“explant”) – inspite of the IUD being marketed as easy to remove.
Records indicate that the manufacturers may have didn't conduct stability testing on the arms of the unit before marketing and distributing it. Proper stability testing likely might have revealed the look defect and permitted because of it to be corrected.
Shouse Law Group is representing Paragard IUD victims from across the United States. We are bringing legal actions against Teva and Cooper to recoup the next money damages for the clients:
medical bills (including fertility treatments),
lost earnings, and
pain and suffering.
This litigation is not just a class action. All of our client's lawsuits remains another reason behind action. But to increase the settlement process, the claims are now being joined into multidistrict litigation (MDL).
Potential cases are ones where in actuality the arm of the device fractures when physicians or medical assistants attempt to remove it. The arm becomes embedded in the uterus or cervix. Patients then need invasive procedures to discover and retrieve the missing piece, like a:
Hysteroscopy
Laparoscopy
Laparotomy (similar to a Caesarean section), or
Hysterectomy (which may be necessary following a uterine rupture)
The time window by which to file a claim is just 1 or 2 years in certain states. So consult by having an attorney the moment possible.
For more details kindly visit ParaGard IUD lawsuit.
No comments:
Post a Comment